CURTIS WILSON MATHIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1990-04-18
No. 87-02526
SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
559 So. 2d 732 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.

FRANK, Judge.

The defendant, Curtis Wilson Mathis, has appealed his judgment and sentence for two counts of possession of controlled substances (one third degree felony and one misdemeanor). We find no error in the conviction. The judge did, however, improperly depart from the guidelines on the basis that the sentence was not sufficient for either correctional or rehabilitative purposes. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Schottel v. State, 590 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …le was involved in the commission of grand theft). Although there were four separate convictions for burglary of a conveyance, mandatory revocation of the driver’s license pursuant to section 322.26(3) is not applicable. See, e.g., Douglas v. State, 559 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (burglary of automobile conviction does not support application of section 322.26(3)). [*488] Although the state did not argue that other sections of Chapter 322 would allow the trial court to forward Schottel’s conviction records…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw