RANDY B. BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RANDY B. BROWN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
560 So. 2d 239
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgments of conviction on the authority of Clark v. State, 553 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). However, because the trial court failed to give written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines, we remand this cause for resentencing. Padgett v. State, 534 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Affirmed in part; remanded in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 593 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1992)…PER CURIAM. We review Brown v. State, 560 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), because of its conflict with Pope v. State, 561 So. 2d 554 (Fla.1990). We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. The trial court imposed a sentence above the range of the sentencing guid…
Authorities Cited
- Clark v. State, 553 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
- Padgett v. State, 534 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Noda v. State, 534 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)