HENRY R. CURRY AND EUGENE TURNER, APPELLANTS,
v.
D. LEHMAN, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1909-01-01
Shackleford and Cockrell, JJ., concur., Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.
57 Fla. 385 Florida Supreme Court (1909) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This case addresses whether a foreign judgment recorded in a general "Judgment Docket" book rather than a separate foreign judgment book creates a statutory lien on real property in another county. The Florida Supreme Court held that such a recording is sufficient to establish the lien and provide notice to purchasers.


Holding

The recording of the foreign judgment in the Judgment Docket book was sufficient to establish the statutory lien and provide notice to purchasers. Although the statutes contemplate a record of foreign judgments, no specific separate book is designated by name in the statutory provisions, and the clerk's practice of recording foreign judgments in the Judgment Docket was appropriate and lawful.


Key Quotes

“a judgment or decree rendered in the Circuit Court of one county "shall create á lien upon the real estate of the defendant situated in another county than the one in which the same shall have been rendered, when a certified transcript of the said judgment or decree shall have been recorded in the count)' in which the real estate so sought to be bound may be situated."”

States the statutory requirement for creating a judgment lien on real property in another county

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A judgment was rendered in 1897 in Duval County Circuit Court. In 1902, a certified transcript was recorded in Manatee County's "Judgment Docket" book…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Whitfield, C. J.

Whitfield, C. J.

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint brought to cancel the record of a judgment as a cloud upon the title to real estate. A judgment rendered in 1897 in the Circuit Court for Duval county, Florida, was in 1902, recorded in a book called “Judgment Docket” in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Manatee county. The clerk testified that prior to 1905 there was no separate book in the office for the record of foreign judgments and that prior to 1905 foreign judgments were recorded in. the book called .'“Judgment Docket;” that at the heading of page 184 of the book called “Judgment Docket” is Inscribed the words “Record of Foreign Judgments,” and that foreign judgments are recorded on subsequent pages of this book, among them being the judgment in controversy.-

A former appeal is reported in Curry v. Lehman, 55 Fla. 847, 47 South. Rep. 18. The only question presented here is whether the record of the judgment as stated is sufficient to create the statutory lien.

The statutes provide that a judgment or decree rendered in the Circuit Court of one county “shall create á lien upon the real estate of the defendant situated in another county than the one in which the same shall have been rendered, when a certified transcript of the said judgment or decree shall have been recorded in the count)' in which the real estate so sought to be bound may be situated.” The clerk shall keep “a record of foreign judgments, in which he shall enter all transcripts of judgments in other counties of the State,” &c.

Sections 1601 and 1831 General Statutes of 1906.

Section 1832 specifies the record books the clerk is required to keep and there is none designated as “Foreign Judgment Book” or by other name to indicate a separate and exclusive book for the record of foreign judgments. This being so and no such book being in fact kept by the clerk when the record of the judgment here was made, it seems that the record of the foreign judgment in the book (designated “Judgment Docket” was appropriate, and particularly so when a portion of that book was used for such purpose. Under the law and the circumstances disclosed the record of the judgment rendered in Duval county in the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court for Manatee county in the book kept by the clerk and designated as “Judgment Docket” was sufficient to establish the statutory lien of the judgment and to give notice to purchasers of real estate affected by the lien of the judgment. See Ivey v. Dawley, 50 Fla. 537, 39 South. Rep. 498.

The decree is affirmed.

Shackleford and Cockrell, JJ., concur. Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Forman v. First Nat'l Bank of Quincy, 76 Fla. 48 (Fla. 1918)
    …the views expressed in the majority opinion are correct, then the decision of this Court upon the first appeal was clearly wrong because the first decree of the Chancellor below according to the majority decreed substantial justice. Cimino v. Smith, 57 Fla. 385, 49 South. Rep. 545; Hobbs v. Frazier, 61 Fla. 611, 55 South. Rep. 848. It is not permissible to assume that the Chancellor did' not pass upon the question of subrogation and then say that as the question is one of fact this Court would have exercis…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw