WASHINGTON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
WASHINGTON
STATE OF FLORIDA
355 So. 3d 482
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2023)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alagabara Awolowo v. State, 389 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
-
Farmer v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)…hat a defendant is competent to proceed, it must enter a written order so finding.”). Consequently, Farmer seeks a remand of this case with instructions to the trial court to make a nunc pro tunc competency determination. See Washington v. State, 355 So. 3d 482, 485-86 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023). The State concedes that remand is necessary because the trial court did not enter a written competency order, but also asserts that our remand instruction should be limited to instructing the trial court to enter a nu…