DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

JOHN D. REED, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• In the Interest of B.B. v. State, 647 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …ggest a relationship between the crime of battery and her lack of a high school diploma. Therefore, appellant claims, there is no rehabilitative objective in her obtaining a GED. In support of her argument, appellant cites In the Interest of J.C.S., 560 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) where this court struck a condition of community control that forbade the juvenile from wearing jewelry because the condition was unrelated to both his charges and rehabilitation. We find appellant’s reliance on J.C.S. misplaced…
• Riedel v. NCNB Nat'l Bank OF Fla., Inc., 591 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …as an independent cause of action in Florida. Economic duress has been recognized as an affirmative defense. See, Associated Housing Corp. v. Keller Building Products of Jacksonville, Inc., 335 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); accord, Deleo v. Spero, 560 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). As for the Count II, styled “breach of statute tort,” the amended complaint does not state allegations demonstrating a breach of the UCC duty of good faith. The UCC duty of good faith may not be imposed to override the express t…
• J.M.B. v. State, 800 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …ate, 782 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Moreover, the trial judge failed to renew the offer of counsel at each stage of the proceedings, in violation of rule 8.165(a). B.I. v. State, 492 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); see also In Interest of J.C.S., 560 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The failure to comply [*319] with rule 8.165 is fundamental error. M.A.F. v. State, 742 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We recognize that the juvenile court judge must contend with an unusually heavy docket, and was dealing, in…

Authorities Cited

• Graham M. Schorb v. Schorb, 547 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)