GIEHL
v.
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, ET AL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
James Giehl appealed a lower court decision in a mortgage servicing dispute against Ocwen Financial Corporation, Shellpoint Mortgage, New Penn Financial, Newrez, and PHH Mortgage. The Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District affirmed the lower court's judgment.
The court affirmed the lower court's decision without providing detailed reasoning or a specific holding statement.
The opinion provides minimal factual detail, identifying only that the case involves James Giehl as appellant against five mortgage servicing entities…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
JAMES GIEHL,
Appellant,
v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION; SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE; NEW PENN FINANCIAL; NEWREZ; and PHH MORTGAGE,
Appellees.
No. 2D2023-2397
September 12, 2025 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen M. Walker, Judge.
James Giehl, pro se.
Sarah Hafeez of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Fort Lauderdale; James H. Wyman and Peter A. Hernandez of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables for Appellees Ocwen Financial Corporation and PHH Mortgage.
Steven B. Greenfield of Greenfield Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton for Appellees Shellpoint Mortgage, New Penn Financial, and Newrez.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur. 2
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.