RICHARD HART,
v.
DESIREE A. HART,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court vacated a civil contempt order against a former husband because the notice of the hearing did not comply with procedural rules, violating his due process rights. The case highlights the strict notice requirements for civil contempt proceedings in family law.
No, the notice of the civil contempt hearing did not comply with Rule 12.615(b). Therefore, the former husband's due process rights were violated, and the civil contempt order must be vacated.
[1] A civil contempt order entered without proper notice to the alleged contemnor violates due process rights.
[2] In Florida family law proceedings, failure to comply with Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.615(b) regarding notice for civil contempt renders the order invalid.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In family law civil contempt proceedings based upon a party’s failure to meet his or her support obligations, the family law procedural rules spell out the due process requirements of proper notice and time to prepare.”
Establishes the importance of procedural rules and due process in family law contempt cases.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe former wife filed a motion for civil contempt and attorney's fees. A hearing was scheduled, but the former husband did not attend. The lower court…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Bodily Attachment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The former husband, Richard Hart, appeals the lower court’s February 4, 2019 order adopting the general magistrate’s report and recommendation on the former wife’s, Desiree Hart, Verified Motion for Civil Contempt, Enforcement and Attorney’s Fees and Costs.
The former husband contends that the subject civil contempt order – entered after a hearing that the former husband did not attend – violated his due process rights because the notice of hearing on the former wife’s civil contempt motion failed to comply with the requirements of Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.615. We agree, and vacate the challenged order.
“In family law civil contempt proceedings based upon a party’s failure to meet his or her support obligations, the family law procedural rules spell out the due process requirements of proper notice and time to prepare.” Kane v. Kane, 247 So. 3d 57, 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); see Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.615(b).1 Failure to comply
Motion and Notice. Civil contempt may be initiated by motion. The motion must recite the essential facts constituting the acts alleged to be contemptuous. No civil contempt may be imposed without notice to the alleged contemnor and without providing the alleged contemnor with an opportunity to be heard. The civil contempt motion and notice of hearing may be served in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516 provided notice is reasonably calculated to apprise the alleged contemnor of the pendency of the proceedings. The notice must specify the time and place of the hearing and must contain the following language: “FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING MAY RESULT IN THE COURT ISSUING A WRIT OF BODILY ATTACHMENT FOR YOUR ARREST. IF YOU ARE ARRESTED, YOU MAY BE HELD IN JAIL UP TO 48 HOURS BEFORE A with the requirements of rule 12.615(b) results in a violation of the opposing party’s due process rights. Id.
Because the notice failed to comply with the express requirements of rule 12.615(b), we vacate the subject order and remand for further proceedings.2
Order vacated; remanded with directions.
HEARING IS HELD.” This notice must also state whether electronic recording or a court reporter is provided by the court or whether a court reporter, if desired, must be provided by the party.