BRANDY VILLALOBOS,
v.
MARIANGELES MARTINEZ,

Fla. 3d DCA | 2019-10-02
No. 19-0155
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2019) Positive Treatment


Opinion of the Court

HENDON, J.

We deny the petition for writ of certiorari. See Worley v. Cent. Fla. Young Men’s Christian Ass’n, 228 So. 3d 18 (Fla. 2017); Angeles-Delgado v. Benitez, No. 3D19-1022 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 11, 2019); but see Younkin v. Blackwelder, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D549 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 22, 2019) (noting the “seemingly disparate treatment in personal injury litigation between plaintiffs and defendants regarding disclosure of” relationship with an expert witness; certifying as question of great public importance whether Worley applies to preclude a defense law firm that is not a party from disclosing financial relationship with experts retained for purposes of litigation), review granted, No. SC19-385 (Fla. May 21, 2019); see also Salber v. Frye, 273 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (same); Dodgen v. Grijalva, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D1617 (Fla. 4th DCA June 26, 2019) (certifying whether Worley applies to preclude an insurance company that is not a party from disclosing financial relationship with experts as a question of great public importance); Dhanraj v. Garcia, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D785 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 22, 2019) (same).

Denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw