MARCO PACE,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
MARCO PACE,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2023)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290 (Fla. 2003) (“Although res judicata may not apply to motions filed under rule 3.800, the similar, but more narrow, doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, does apply.”); Ali v. State, 911 So. 2d 164, 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“[T]he trial court correctly denied the defendant’s claim regarding lack of notice as this claim may not be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 . . . .”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Antoine L. McBRIDE, 848 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 2003)
- Rappsodi Rhahavi ALI v. State, 911 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)