MARIA CONSUELO ESPINOSA, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Zonald Watson Weatherford v. State, 561 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …52, 757 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In this case, the court did not comply with this requirement of the statute before admitting the testimony of any of these witnesses who testified to T.J.’s out-of-court statements. This was clear error. Fricke v. State, 561 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (evidence of out-of-court statements by child abuse victim admitted pursuant to the recently created exception to the hearsay rule provided by section 90.803(23) violates the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation unle…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Davis v. State, 569 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …he statute requires the trial court to necessarily provide findings which address indicia of unreliability as well as indicia of reliability where the findings on the record are case-specific and detailed as in the instant case. See Fricke v. State, 561 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1990) (case-specific findings of reliability required by Florida Statute to support out-of-court hearsay statements of child-victim of sexual abuse). The appellant also challenges the sufficiency of evidence to support two of his sexu…
• Hernandez v. State, 597 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …s of sexual or other abuse from the additional trauma of testifying in open court, in defendant’s presence. See Glendening v. State, 536 So. 2d 212, 218 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 907, 109 S.Ct. 3219, 106 L.Ed.2d 569 (1989); Fricke v. State, 561 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Children who hear their mother plead for their lives and see her shot and killed fall within the class of victims that the public policy seeks to protect. Gonzales, 818 S.W. 2d at 766-777; see Russell v. State, 572 So. 2d 940 (Fl…

Authorities Cited

• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)
• Thomas v. State, 531 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1988)