MARKIEPH PALMER
v.
MCINTOSH KEMARLEY RASHAWN

Fla. 3d DCA | 2024-10-30
No. 2024-0730
Logue, C.J., Scales, J., Bokor, J., Lopez, J.
2024 FL 12498 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A dismissal without prejudice based on vexatious litigant status is nonappealable and nonfinal, but the court affirmed the underlying vexatious litigant designation.


Headnotes

[1] A dismissal without prejudice generally constitutes a nonappealable, nonfinal order.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Palmer, a pro se litigant, filed a complaint against McIntosh Kemarley Rashawn. The trial court dismissed Palmer's complaint without prejudice based o…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 30, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-0730 Lower Tribunal No. 23-19800-CA-01

________________

Markieph Palmer, Appellant,

vs.

McIntosh Kemarley Rashawn, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.

Markieph Palmer, in proper person.

No appearance, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

2

The order on review dismisses Palmer’s pro se complaint without prejudice based on Palmer’s designation as a vexatious litigant pursuant to section 68.093, Florida Statutes, and failure to comply with the requirements of filing for a vexatious litigant. The order on review references that such designation has been affirmed by this court. See Palmer v. Robertson, No. 3D23-1499 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 13, 2024) (affirming dismissal with prejudice after designation as a vexatious litigant, where such order bars Palmer from filing any subsequent pro se complaint in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit “without first obtaining leave of the administrative judge in accordance with Section 68.093(4)”). Additionally, a dismissal without prejudice generally constitutes a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See Al-Hakim v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., 161 So. 3d 568, 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw