HENRY CYRUS LUCAS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.

Fla. 3d DCA | 2025-05-28
No. 2024-1768
2025 FL 4436 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Henry Cyrus Lucas filed a mandamus petition seeking public records from the State of Florida. The Third District Court of Appeal dismissed the petition as moot because Lucas received the records he originally requested before the appeal was decided.


Holding

The court granted the motion to dismiss the petition as moot because the petitioner received the records that were the subject of the original request, rendering the mandamus petition moot.


Headnotes

[1] A petition for writ of mandamus will be dismissed as moot when the petitioner has already received the records that were the subject of the request.

[2] A direct appeal is the proper vehicle for review of a mandamus petition denied for reasons other than the merits.

Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“We grant the motion to dismiss the petition as moot because the petitioner received the records requested.”

States the court's holding that mootness is appropriate because Lucas received the records he sought.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Lucas made a specific request for public records from the State of Florida. The requested public records existed but were not timely produced by the r…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 28, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Nos. 3D24-1540, 3D24-1768 Lower Tribunal No. F07-27539

Henry Cyrus Lucas, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, et al., Appellees.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.

Henry Cyrus Lucas, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General; Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Christopher A. Angell, Assistant County Attorney, for appellees.

Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

We grant the motion to dismiss the petition as moot because the petitioner received the records requested. See Roe v. Dep't of Health, 312 So. 3d 175, 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (dismissing mandamus petition as moot where petitioner already received requested records); see also Battle v. Fla. Comm'n on Offender Rev., 188 So. 3d 10, 12 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (noting that direct appeal is proper vehicle for review of mandamus petition denied for reasons other than merits, but affirming where petition was properly dismissed as moot); Moeller v. Se. Fla. Behav. Health Network, Inc., 392 So. 3d 579, 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (describing elements for public records claims under Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, including how claimant must show that "they made a specific request for public records, the [respondent] received it, the requested public records exist, and the [respondent] improperly refused to produce [the public records] in a timely manner” (quotation omitted)). 1

1 We take no position on the petitioner's entitlement to records that were subsequently requested after the filing of the underlying petition and this appeal. 2


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw