TIMOTHY LAMAR DINKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TIMOTHY LAMAR DINKS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
561 So. 2d 1280
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, fifteen years old at the time of the crimes charged in this case, was sentenced as an adult. There was, however, no written decision to impose adult sanctions setting forth findings of fact and reasons as is required by section 39.-lll(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987). Therefore, we reverse the sentences and remand for compliance with the statute.
RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weigel v. State, 581 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…, and it shall be in conformity with each of the above criteria. The court shall render a specific finding of fact and the reasons to impose adult sanctions. Failure to comply with this section requires reversal of the sentence. See Dinks v. State, 561 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Dix v. State, 533 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 2d DCA [*635] 1988); Clemons v. State, 508 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Reversed and remanded for new trial. SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.…