CHARLIE D. ALTMAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Once a court has ruled on an issue, that ruling becomes the law of the case and precludes relitigation of the same issue in subsequent appeals.
“The law of the case precludes relitigation of all issues necessarily ruled upon by the court . . . . A per curiam affirmance does establish the law of the case.”
Court's application of the law of the case doctrine to support affirmance
Altman appealed a decision to the Third District Court of Appeal, which had previously decided related issues in two prior opinions in the same case.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Per Curiam Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Altman v. State, 422 So. 3d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025); Altman v. State, 394 So. 3d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024); see also State v. Stabile, 443 So. 2d 398, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (“The law of the case precludes relitigation of all issues necessarily ruled upon by the court . . . . A per curiam affirmance does establish the law of the case.").
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Kingsway Condo. Apts. NO. 1, Inc. v. Kingsway Builders, Inc., 443 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)