JONATHAN AGUIRRE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A jury verdict will not be disturbed on appeal when substantial, competent evidence supports the conviction and the jury has properly determined that the evidence excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.
“it is 'the jury's duty to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Where there is substantial, competent evidence to support the jury verdict, that determination will not be disturbed by the courts.'”
Cited from Kocaker v. State, establishing the standard for appellate review of jury verdicts in criminal cases.
Jonathan Aguirre was convicted by a jury at trial. The case was appealed to the Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review Of Jury Verdicts cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Kocaker v. State, 119 So. 3d 1214, 1227 (Fla. 2013) ("[I]t is 'the jury's duty to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. Where there is substantial, competent evidence to support the jury verdict, that determination will not be disturbed by the courts.'" (quoting Durousseau v. State, 55 So. 3d 543, 557 (Fla. 2010))).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Durousseau v. State, 55 So. 3d 543 (Fla. 2010)
- Genghis Nicholas Kocaker v. State, 119 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. 2013)