S.H., A JUVENILE,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nondisclosure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Materno v. State, 766 So. 2d 358, 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“While defendant claims there was a nondisclosure of one of defendant’s statements to the detective who investigated the case, the record refutes this claim . . . [T]he allegedly nondisclosed fact was included in his written report, which was given to the defense.”); B.T.G. v. State, 694 So. 2d 767, 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (Although “the statement itself was not provided to defense counsel, . . . notice of the contents of the statement, . . . was on the back of the arrest report, which was provided as part of discovery. Assuming, without deciding, that under these circumstances, a Richardson1 inquiry was required, it would be harmless error in this instance. The . . . substance of the statement had been furnished to the defense, so the defense was not materially affected by not having the appellant’s statement.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1971)
- B.T.G. v. State, 694 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Materno v. State, 766 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)