MARVIN YOUNG,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
MARVIN YOUNG,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2020)
Per_curiam
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See James v. State, 237 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (citing State v. Harris, 129 So. 3d 1166, 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“Harris first argued in his 3.800(a) motion that the sentence for count 5 was illegal because the trial court did not orally pronounce the sentence. . . . [T]he record reflects that Harris completed these sentences. This issue is thus moot.”)).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Harris, 129 So. 3d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
- James v. State, 237 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)