SURESH GIDWANI AND BINA GIDWANI,
v.
SHERRY ROBERTS, ET AL.,
SURESH GIDWANI AND BINA GIDWANI,
SHERRY ROBERTS, ET AL.,
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2020)
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Murphy v. Murphy, 370 So. 2d 403, 408 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (“In order to overcome the trial court’s findings upon a sufficiency of the evidence
point, it is necessary for an appellant to go beyond merely showing that the more reasonable view of the evidence, in his opinion, supports a contrary finding.”); see also Plana v. Sainz, 990 So. 2d 554, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding alleged error in no damages award waived); Coconut Key Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Gonzalez, 246 So. 3d 428, 433 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (deeming party entitled to fees under section 720.305(1), worded similarly to 718.303(1), despite “no damages” award), receded from on other grounds by Sherman v. Sherman, 279 So. 3d 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Suresh Gidwani and Bina Gidwani v. Roberts, 349 So. 3d 917 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)
Authorities Cited
- Murphy v. Murphy, 370 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Rosalba Mora v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
- Gonzalez v. Coconut Key Homeowners Assoc., Inc., 246 So. 3d 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)