ROBERT MOEGERLE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND THE ESTATE OF SUE I. MOEGERLE, A/K/A ERMA SUE MOEGERLE, APPELLANTS,
v.
LAURENCE CUSICK AND DIANA CUSICK, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
ROBERT MOEGERLE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND THE ESTATE OF SUE I. MOEGERLE, A/K/A ERMA SUE MOEGERLE, APPELLANTS,
LAURENCE CUSICK AND DIANA CUSICK, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
563 So. 2d 142
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Marrone v. Miami National Bank, 507 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kersh v. Kersh, 613 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…ildren from the subsequent marriage. There was no testimony of unmet needs. Thus, the one and only factual finding of increased income was not legally sufficient to justify the recommendation of increased child support. See Castellano v. Castellano, 563 So. 2d 142, 144 (Fla. 4th DCA1990). We therefore affirm the order of the trial court. DELL, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur. . The wife’s attorney even objected to testimony as to the children’s needs on the grounds of relevancy because h…
Authorities Cited
- Carmine Marrone v. Miami Nat'l Bank, 507 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)