R. P. LAPHAM, AND HIS WIFE, MRS. R. P. LAPHAM, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
TOWN OF SALERNO, MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
R. P. LAPHAM, AND HIS WIFE, MRS. R. P. LAPHAM, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
TOWN OF SALERNO, MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE
105 Fla. 533
Florida Supreme Court (1932)
Caution
Also reported at: 141 So. 597
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Teeeell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE Cnty. OIL Co., Inc. v. Marshall, 98 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957)…that the judgment appealed from must be and the same is hereby reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. STURGIS, C. J., and O’CONNELL, STEPHEN C., A. J., concur. . E.g.: Terranova v. Stearns, 108 Fla. 21, 141 So. 597, 145 So. 256; Collins Ave. & Ocean Investment Co. v. Crawford, 114 Fla. 469, 154 So. 211; Southern Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Kaiser, 150 Fla. 52, 7 Solid 600. . See: Mizner Land Corp. v. Abbott, 128 Fla. 489, 175 So. 507. . Hart v. Grim, 8 Cir.…
-
Jones v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 110 Fla. 69 (Fla. 1933)…rtow Bank when the latter became insolvent. See Butler v. Tunnicliffe (Fla.), 140 South. Rep. 201; Robinson v. Aird, 43 Fla. 30, 29 South. Rep. 633; Chipley State Bank v. McNeill, 77 Fla. 827, 82 South. Rep. 292. In Dickinson v. Tunnicliffe (Fla.), 141 South. Rep. 597, this Court recognized the principle that a debtor to an insolvent bank may set off the amount of his deposit in an action by the Liquidator against the debtor on the latter’s indebtedness, but the distinction was made that in such case the right of…