CHRISTOPHER WALK
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reversed a trial court's denial of credit for probation time served. The court held that a defendant is entitled to credit for time served on concurrent sentences, even if resentenced for the same crime.
Yes, a defendant is entitled to credit against each concurrent probationary sentence for the time already served on probation when resentenced for the same offenses.
[1] A defendant is entitled to credit for time served on a probationary sentence when resentenced for the same crime.
[2] When multiple sentences are imposed concurrently, credit must be awarded for time served on each sentence in any resentencing for those multiple convictions.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“When a criminal defendant is sentenced after being convicted of a crime and serves some portion of that sentence, he or she is entitled to receive credit for the actual service of that sentence, or any portion thereof, in a resentencing for the same crime.”
Establishes the general principle of credit for time served upon resentencing.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant was sentenced for three felonies to a prison term followed by ten years of probation, to be served concurrently. After serving the prison po…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probationary Term cases and more on FLexlaw
WARNER, J.
We reverse the denial of credit for probation time served. When the trial court resentenced appellant for three felonies to correct an illegal sentence, it failed to give appellant credit against the probation portion of the new sentences based upon the probation appellant had already served.
Appellant was sentenced for three counts of third-degree felonies. After a series of hearings and mitigation of the original sentence, the court sentenced appellant to eighteen months in prison followed by ten years of probation. The court pronounced a general sentence for all three felonies. The court did not announce that the sentences would be served concurrently. Accordingly, the written sentence provided that both the prison portion and the probation portion would be served concurrently. See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. (2017) (“A defendant convicted of two or more offenses charged in the same indictment, information, or affidavit or in consolidated indictments, informations, or affidavits shall serve the sentences of imprisonment concurrently unless the court directs that two or more of the sentences be served consecutively.”).
After appellant served the prison portion of the sentence, he filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence. He contended that the ten-year probationary sentence to be served concurrently was an illegal sentence, because it exceeded the statutory maximum of five years for each offense. The trial court resentenced appellant on Count I to eighteen months in prison, with credit for time served on Count II to five years of probation, and on Count III to five years of probation, all to be served consecutively.1 Appellant asked for thirty months credit against the probation sentence on Counts II and III for the time he had already served on probation as to both counts. In a later order, the court ultimately granted credit against Count II but not Count III. Appellant appeals his sentence, maintaining that he is also entitled to credit against the probationary term imposed in Count III.
Appellant is correct that he was entitled to credit against each count for the time he served on probation concurrently on each offense.
When a criminal defendant is sentenced after being convicted of a crime and serves some portion of that sentence, he or she is entitled to receive credit for the actual service of that sentence, or any portion thereof, in a resentencing for the same crime. Likewise, if multiple convictions result in concurrent sentences, credit must be awarded for time served on each sentence in any resentencing for the multiple convictions. The word “concurrently” simply means “at the same time,” and by imposing sentences to be served concurrently, a trial court is permitting a defendant to serve multiple sentences at the same time.
State v. Rabedeau, 2 So. 3d 191, 193 (Fla. 2009). Because appellant was serving concurrent sentences during the probationary period prior to his resentencing, he was entitled to credit against each count for the probation he served. We thus reverse for the trial court to provide credit for probation time served on each count.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. * * *