LECEDRIC PRENTICE HARRIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2022-09-14
No. 2021-3285
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2022)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Kovaleski v. State, 103 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 2012). On the issue of costs, reversal is not warranted because the State has identified costs which total the $418 imposed. Cf. Bartolone v. State, 327 So. 3d 331, 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (reversing where the “trial court did not cite to any other mandatory costs, and the State has not identified costs which would total $418”) (emphasis supplied).

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw