JOHN PAUL
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2024-02-14
No. 2023-0874
Kollra, J., Warner, J., Damoorgian, J., Forst, J.
2024 FL 1565 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2024)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under Florida Statute § 790.23(1) is constitutional and properly supported.


Headnotes

[1] Florida Statute § 790.23(1), prohibiting possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, is constitutional.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

John Paul was convicted of violating section 790.23(1), Florida Statutes (2021), which prohibits possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN PAUL, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Nos. 4D2022-1455 and 4D2023-0874

[February 14, 2024]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 21001938CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of section 790.23(1), Florida Statutes (2021), prohibiting possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm as to all issues raised, including upholding the constitutionality of the statute. See Edenfield v. State, No. 1D22-290, --- So. 3d ---, 2023 WL 3734459 (Fla. 1st DCA May 31, 2023), reh’g denied, --- So. 3d ---, 2023 WL 4924150 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 2, 2023).

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw