MELANIE BERES
v.
KILLIAN BERES- PETERSON

Fla. 4th DCA | 2025-02-12
No. 2024-0691
2025 FL 1227 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Two daughters obtained domestic violence protective injunctions against their mother, Melanie Beres. The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed both injunctions, holding that the evidence did not establish imminent danger of domestic violence, and noting that these statutes are not designed to substitute for Baker Act or guardianship proceedings.


Holding

The evidence failed to demonstrate that the petitioner daughters were in imminent danger of becoming victims of any act of domestic violence committed by their mother within the meaning of Florida Statutes sections 741.29–741.31. The court held that the domestic violence protection statutes are not designed to serve as substitutes for Baker Act proceedings or guardianship proceedings.


Key Quotes

“We reverse two injunctions for protection against domestic violence which two daughters obtained against their mother. Although both injunctions appear to be well-intentioned, the evidence below failed to demonstrate that the petitioner daughters were in imminent danger of becoming victims of any act of domestic violence committed by their mother, within the meaning of sections 741.29–741.31, Florida Statutes (2024).”

Establishes the core holding that the evidence was insufficient to meet the statutory requirement of imminent danger of domestic violence.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Two daughters (Raven Beres Peterson and Killian Beres Peterson) obtained injunctions for protection against domestic violence against their mother, Me…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MELANIE BERES, Appellant,

V.

RAVEN BERES PETERSON, Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0684

MELANIE BERES, Appellant,

V.

KILLIAN BERES PETERSON, Appellee.

No. 4D2024-0691

[February 12, 2025]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Dina Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502024DR001311 and 502024DR001310.

Melanie Beres, Milwaukee, WI, pro se.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse two injunctions for protection against domestic violence which two daughters obtained against their mother. Although both injunctions appear to be well-intentioned, the evidence below failed to demonstrate that the petitioner daughters were in imminent danger of becoming victims of any act of domestic violence committed by their mother, within the meaning of sections 741.29–741.31, Florida

Statutes (2024). Those statutory sections are not designed to be substitutes for the Baker Act¹ or guardianship proceedings.

We reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the injunctions.

Reversed and remanded.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur. * * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw