DEBORAH LEE COX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the state improperly impeached the appellant's testimony with evidence of a previous fire and failed to prove the witness tampering charge as alleged.
Appellant was convicted of arson, theft, insurance fraud, and witness tampering. The state used evidence of a prior, dissimilar, accidental fire in Te…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse First Degree Arson cases and more on FLexlaw
CAMPBELL, Judge.
After the burning of her home, appellant, Deborah Lee Cox, was convicted of first degree arson, conspiracy to commit arson, grand theft first degree, burning to defraud an insurer and insurance fraud. She was also convicted of tampering with a state witness. All of the convictions are reversed.
We reverse each of the charges arising out of the burning of appellant’s home because the state improperly attempted to impeach appellant’s testimony by offering evidence of a previous fire in Tennessee. There was little similarity between the Tennessee fire and the burning of her home in Florida. Moreover, the fire in Tennessee was not of a suspicious nature, the fire marshal having ruled it accidental. The use of testimony concerning such an incident was an improper attempt to impeach appellant’s testimony. See Heuring v. State, 513 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1987); Gelabert v. State, 407 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Hooper v. State, 115 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). Having concluded that we must reverse appellant’s convictions for first degree arson, conspiracy to commit arson, grand theft first degree, burning to defraud an insurer and insurance fraud, we need not address appellant’s double jeopardy issue.
We also reverse appellant’s conviction for tampering with a witness. The information charged that appellant used force or threats of force to persuade a state’s witness to leave Florida and not testify. The state failed to carry its burden to prove the offense as charged.
Reversed and remanded.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Fundora, 513 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1987)
- Frederick A.R. Heuring v. State, 513 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1987)
- Gelabert v. State, 407 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Jackson Holloway Hooper v. State, 115 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)