RON E. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1990-07-19
No. 90-566
JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
563 So. 2d 1136 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Ron E. Williams appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel and three procedural errors. We affirm.

With regard to the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the motion is facially insufficient, i.e., the allegations of deficiencies are too general. See Williams v. State, 553 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The remaining allegations could and should have been raised on direct appeal, and therefore cannot be raised in a motion for post-conviction relief. See, e.g., Demps v. State, 515 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1987). Based on the foregoing, we find that the motion was properly denied.

Affirmed.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dantler v. State, 584 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing and sentencing. Gardner v. State, 569 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Earle v. State, 519 So. 2d 757, 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Haynes v. State, 571 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Morris v. [*199] State, 563 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943, 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). At the hearing in this cause, the trial court found appellant in violation of three conditions of probation. However, the order revoking probation fails to set forth the sp…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw