CHARLES MCKNIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Charles McKnight appeals his conviction for armed robbery. We conclude first that there was no violation of Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971). See Bush v. State, 461 So. 2d 936, 938 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031, 106 S.Ct. 1237, 89 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986). Second, we conclude that the firearm was properly admitted into evidence. Bega v. State, 100 So. 2d 455, 457-58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). Finally, the evidence was sufficient to support McKnight’s conviction and the trial court properly denied the motion for judgment of acquittal. See Pressley v. State, 395 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 407 So. 2d 1105 (Fla.1981).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. McKAY, 568 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Here, the husband filed a written objection prior to the hearing. Thus, the trial court erred in overruling the husband’s objections and approving the report’s provisions pertaining to attorney’s fees and costs. Kuper v. Kuper, 564 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Bathurst; Slattery v. Slattery, 528 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(c). Furthermore, the husband did not waive his right to object by participating in the hearing after filing his objection. Kuper; see Bathurs…
-
Rosen v. The Honorable Harold Solomon, 586 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…by the defendants-petitioners. Bathurst v. Turner, 533 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); accord Wilson v. McKay, 568 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (agreement to previous order of reference does not waive objection to subsequent order); Kuper v. Kuper, 564 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Slattery v. Slattery, 528 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Accordingly, mandamus is granted requiring the trial court itself to hear and determine those matters. Bathurst, 533 So. 2d at 939. The petitions are otherwise denied. Th…
-
Raines v. State, 600 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…appeals his conviction for burglary with an assault. We conclude, first, that there was suffi [*48] cient evidence to support the conviction of defendant of that offense. See Hernandez v. State, 569 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); McKnight v. State, 564 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Second, it was permissible for the trial court to charge the jury on the instant offense, as it was a lesser included offense of the main charge, burglary with an assault or battery with a handgun. See State v. Johnson, 601 So. 2…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1971)
- Bush v. State, 461 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 1984)
- Jones v. United States, 475 U.S. 1031 (U.S. 1986)
- Speckin v. United States, 475 U.S. 1031 (U.S. 1986)
- Irven George Pressley v. State, 395 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Kroetz v. Quinn, 100 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)