SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., AS PRINCIPAL; AND SAFECO CO., INC., AS SURETY, APPELLANTS,
v.
GREFS CONSTRUCTION & ROOFING CORPORATION, AND YUGO'S DRYWALL, INC., APPELLEES
SOUTHEAST BANK, N.A., AS PRINCIPAL; AND SAFECO CO., INC., AS SURETY, APPELLANTS,
GREFS CONSTRUCTION & ROOFING CORPORATION, AND YUGO'S DRYWALL, INC., APPELLEES
564 So. 2d 199
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Gesco, Inc. v. Edward L. Nezelek, Inc., 414 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 426 So. 2d 27 (Fla.1983).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Juvon D. Pickett v. State, 922 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…icers Pena and Gomez at the Jackson emergency room are admissible since we hold that he was not in custody at that time. The trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress his statements in that regard is affirmed. See Williams v. State, 564 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)(statements made outside emergency room prior to Miranda in response to information gathering admissible in felony-murder prosecution). II. The defendant’s second ground on appeal is his claim that the trial court erred in dismi…
-
Peek v. State, 575 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…65 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Miranda rights do not attach until there is an in-custody interrogation, and nothing in the record suggests that the officer placed appellant in custody prior to the incriminating statement. See Williams v. State, 564 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Morris v. State, 557 So. 2d 27 (Fla.1990). The trial court correctly denied the motion to suppress. AFFIRMED. W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Gesco, Inc. v. Edward L. Nezelek, Inc., 414 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)