DAVID L. EGGERS, A/K/A DAVID D. STACEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dwelling cases and more on FLexlaw
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Appellant appeals a judgment and sentences finding him guilty pursuant to his nolo contendere plea of six counts of armed burglary of a dwelling and one count of aggravated assault with a firearm. We affirm his convictions and sentences except that we remand for correction of the written sentence imposed for aggravated assault with a firearm.
At the sentencing hearing, the trial judge orally sentenced appellant on the aggravated assault with a firearm count to five years in prison including a three-year mandatory minimum, the maximum allowable sentence. However, the written sentence on that count reflects imposition of a 17-year term followed by five years probation, a sentence which exceeds the maximum allowable by law. Therefore, we remand for correction of the written sentence on the aggravated assault with the firearm count to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Harden v. State, 557 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) and Brammer v. State, 554 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of sentence consistent with this opinion.
BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harper v. Sebring Int'l Raceway, Inc., 886 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…ine test, evidence of medical causation is also required. Id. We review the JCC’s findings regarding the compensability of claimant’s heart attack to ascertain whether it is supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Gardinier, Inc. v. Coker, 564 So. 2d 254, 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (applying the competent, substantial evidence standard in reviewing the JCC’s finding that the claimant’s heart attack was compensable). In finding that claimant’s heart attack was not compensable, the JCC found the serious…
-
Stacey v. State, 596 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…ntences for six instances of armed burglary of a dwelling. We also affirmed his conviction and sentence as pronounced for one instance of aggravated assault with a firearm, but remanded for correction of the sentence as written. See Stacey v. State, 564 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). On remand, the trial court imposed six concurrent, 17-year sentences, followed by five years probation, and one concurrent five-year sentence for the aggravated assault. All seven sentences carry three-year minimum mandatory t…
-
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. & Constitution State Serv. Co. v. Perdue, 955 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…d compensable if the extent of claimant’s activity was significantly greater at or before the time of injury than was usually the case and not routine to the job that the claimant was accustomed to performing. Id.; see also Gardinier, Inc. v. Coker, 564 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). The majority suggests that the claimant here is required to introduce a specific type of evidence to establish that his employment exertion was not routine under the Victor Wine test. While the majority’s suggestions are certa…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Brammer v. State, 554 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
- Harden v. State, 557 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)