SUNSHINE CITRUS CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hapney v. Cent. Garage, Inc., 579 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …ospectively. Ziccardi v. Strother, 570 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Included in this category are statutes governing the burden of proof in civil actions. Walker & LaBerge, Inc. v. Halligan, 344 So. 2d 239 (Fla.1977); Stein v. Miller Indus. Inc., 564 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); see also, Dep’t of Agric. & Consumer Servcs. v. Bonanno, 568 So. 2d 24 (Fla.1990). The right created by section 542.12, and carried forward in section 542.33(2)(a), is to enter into a covenant not to compete in derogation of the…
• Kenz v. Miami-Dade Cnty. & Unicco Serv. Co., 116 So. 3d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
  …p’t, 599 So. 2d 1353, 1355 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (concluding that statutory amendment that affected an evidentiary vehicle to support a claim was “in the nature of a procedural burden of proof enactment”); Stuart L. Stein, P.A. v. Miller Indus., Inc., 564 So. 2d 539, 540 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (holding that “increasing the burden of proof to a ‘clear and convincing’ standard did not amount to a substantive change in the statutory scheme” and therefore, may be applied retroactively); City of Clermont v. Rumph, 450…
• Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Hurst, 949 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)
  …f action, the provision is procedural in nature, and may be applied retroactively. See Shaps, 826 So. 2d at 254 (recognizing that “generally in Florida the [*288] burden of proof is a procedural issue”); Stuart L. Stein, P.A. v. Miller Indus., Inc., 564 So. 2d 539, 540 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)(holding that “increasing the burden of proof to a ‘clear and convincing’ standard did not amount to a substantive change in the statutory scheme” and therefore, may be applied retroactively). Based upon our findings and ana…

Authorities Cited

• Division of Administration v. Cap. Plaza, Inc., 397 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 1981)
• Division of Administration v. Ness Trailer Park, Inc., 489 So. 2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)