SUN-ISLAND REALTY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
M.D. MOODY & SONS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge.
After fully considering the issues presented in this replevin matter, we have determined that the trial court did not err in entering a final judgment awarding the appellee possession of the property. We have found, however, that the trial court, notwithstanding its consideration of the criteria announced in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1985), failed to embody specific findings in the final judgment in support of granting the appellee an attorney’s fee contemplated in section 78.20, Florida Statutes (1989).
Thus, we remand for the entry of an order satisfying the requirements of Rowe. DeLoach v. Westman, 506 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Liggon, 668 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…form was available and competent substantial evidence does not support the determination that the men’s fitting room job offered to her constituted sheltered employment, the JCC erred in finding to the contrary. See U.S. Foundry & Mfg. Co. v. Serpa, 564 So. 2d 559, 561-62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (court reversed PTD finding where claimant refused to attempt job as security guard offered by the employer at first merits hearing, despite doctor’s conclusion that he could handle job: “[Tjhere is no competent substanti…
-
Shaw v. Publix Supermarkets, 609 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…in late October 1990 but was unable to work more than 3 Vi hours on any single day. She then discontinued working because she said it was too difficult and painful. These facts distinguish the case sub judice from U.S. Foundry & Manuf. Co. v. Serpa, 564 So. 2d 559, 561 (Fla. 1st DCA1990) and Broward County Sheriffs Off. v. Williams, 430 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 1st DCA1983). E/C contend the light-duty working conditions were arranged to assist Claimant’s recovery, but not because any medical evidence necessitated sp…
-
Carter v. City OF Venice, 584 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…benefits, .a claimant must show either that he is unable to do light work uninterruptedly due to physical limitations, or that he has conducted a lengthy, exhaustive job search which has proved futile. U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Company v. Serpa, 564 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Our review of the record shows that no view of the evidence would support the conclusion that the claimant did not satisfy the above articulated alternative method of establishing entitlement to PTD by engaging in a lengthy, exh…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985)
- Guion T. DE Loach v. Westman, 506 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)