THOMAS MIMMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Defendant's conviction for possession of a firearm while committing a felony was vacated because dual punishments for aggravated assault and firearm possession arising from the same act violate Florida law, leaving only the aggravated assault conviction and sentence intact.
When two convictions arise from the same underlying act, dual punishments are improper and the lesser conviction must be vacated.
[1] When two convictions arise from the same underlying act and episode, dual punishments are improper and the conviction carrying the lesser penalty must be vacated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDefendant was convicted of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm while engaged in the commission of a felony, both arising from the same epis…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Concurrent Vs. Consecutive Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant was convicted of aggravated assault and possession of a firearm while engaged in the commission of a felony. The trial court imposed a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for aggravated assault to run concurrently with a three-year sentence for possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony. The defendant’s claim here is that since both offenses arose from the same episode, his conviction for aggravated assault should be vacated with directions to resentence him only upon his conviction of possession of a firearm while engaged in the commission of a felony.
The defendant argues that the aggravated assault offense carries a higher penalty and would ordinarily be a greater offense except in the present case the jury did not determine that a firearm was used during the commission of the aggravated assault. The state correctly points out, however, that the verdict form clearly showed that the jury found the defendant guilty “as to the aggravated assault charged in the information” and that the information clearly charged the defendant with the assault of the police officer with the firearm and consequently the aggravated assault conviction and sentence were proper under Rios v. State, 510 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
We nonetheless observe that the two convictions were based upon the same underlying act and dual punishments are improper. Carawan v. State, 515 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1987). For the foregoing reasons, the conviction and sentence of the possession of the firearm are vacated and the remainder of the sentence is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Dion Michael Carawan v. State, 515 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1987)
- Leonel Rios v. State, 510 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)