IN THE INTEREST OF R.D., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We find that the record below supports the adjudication of delinquency. However, we find that the trial court erred in placing the child on community control until his nineteenth birthday. Since the child was found guilty of the offense of criminal mischief, a second degree misdemeanor, the maximum statutorily authorized period of community control was sixty days. Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1989) and J.S. v. State, 552 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appealed order is affirmed, except as to the duration of community control. That portion of the appealed order which specifies the duration of community control is reversed, and the cause is remanded for modification of the order in accordance with this opinion.
WENTWORTH, NIMMONS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
deMCO Techs., Inc. v. C.S. Engineered Castings, Inc., 769 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…Innovative Clothing Exch., Inc., 615 So. 2d 249, 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (failure to pay for clothing); Hatcher v. Hatcher, 598 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (failure to pay pursuant to oral agreement). See also AM Sampling, Inc. v. White Lab., Inc., 564 So. 2d 590, 592 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (holding that “[t]he fact that a Florida resident has contracted with a nonresident is insufficient in and of itself to establish automatically the minimum contacts necessary to confer personal jurisdiction on the nonresiden…
-
E.J. v. State, 595 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…Chapter 90-208, Laws of Florida, that statute had been interpreted as limiting a juvenile’s maximum term of community control or community service to the maximum term for which an adult could have been sentenced for the same offense. R.D. v. State, 564 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); M.G. v. State, 556 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); J.S. v. State, 552 So. 2d 327, 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); R.H. v. State, 549 So. 2d 742, 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The offense in the instant case was committed October 13, 1990. S…
-
Quality Christmas Trees Co., Inc. v. Florico Foliage, Inc., 689 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…471 U.S. 462, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985). Likewise, a complaint alleging that the act of payment was to be performed in Florida is not sufficient to meet the minimum contacts requirement. See Am Sampling, Inc. v. White Laboratories, Inc., 564 So. 2d 590 (5th DCA 1990). Therefore, standing alone, Florico’s allegation that Quality failed to make payment in Florida is insufficient to satisfy the constitutional requirement of minimum contacts. In the absence of an affidavit from Florico, we are left w…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In the Interest of J.S. v. State, 552 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)