M.G., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
M.G., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
564 So. 2d 630
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
COBB, Judge.
The trial judge entered a disposition order directing that M.G., a child, pay restitution “for and on behalf of the victim.” Unfortunately, the amount of that restitution was not included in the order. This determination cannot be delegated to a probation officer. Shipley v. State, 528 So. 2d 902 (Fla.1988). In point of fact, the order does not purport to delegate this responsibility; rather, the amount of restitution appears to have been inadvertently omitted from the order. REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT HEREWITH.
COBB, COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peterson v. State, 578 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…nasmissible at trial. We agree. Since violation of a city ordinance is treated as a misdemeanor, only the officers’ own observations will be considered in determining probable cause to arrest. § 901.15(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Heller v. City of Ocala, 564 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Towne v. State, 495 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In the instant case, the record shows the officers observed Peterson sitting on a bench outside a bar with a plastic container beside him. The officers testified they neither…
Authorities Cited
- Shipley v. State, 528 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 1988)