FREDERICK WING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FREDERICK WING, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
564 So. 2d 634
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1990)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
GOSHORN, Judge.
Frederick Wing appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He alleges that his plea of nolo contendere was not knowingly or voluntarily entered. We remand to the trial court for either attachment of that portion of the record which refutes his allegations, or for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HARRIS, J., concurs.
DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion only.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City Nat'l Bank OF Fla. v. Tescher, 578 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1991)…, C.J., dissenting). Accordingly, “[ajrticle X, section 4(c) is designed to protect two classes of persons only: surviving spouses and minor children. [Petitioners] are neither of these, they are adult children.” Wadsworth v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 564 So. 2d 634, 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Moreover, the restraint on the right of an individual to devise property at death should not be extended beyond that expressly allowed by the constitution. In re Estate of McGinty, 258 So. 2d 450 (Fla.1971). Thus, only the…
-
In re Est. of Burtrez J. Morrow v. Bacon, 611 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…re Hersch, 23 B.R. 42 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1982). “Accordingly, ‘[a]rticle X, section 4(c) is designed to protect two classes of persons only: surviving spouses and minor children.’ ” Tescher, 578 So. 2d at 703, citing Wadsworth v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 564 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See also Hartwell v. Blasingame, 564 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA1990), approved, 584 So. 2d 6 (Fla.1991) (adult child could not [*82] seek protection of constitutional homestead provision because she was not in the class of persons…
-
Jacobs v. W.O. "Jake" Jacobs, 633 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…g spouse has waived homestead rights in a valid antenuptial agreement, there is no constitutional restriction on the devise of homestead property. City Nat’l Bank of Florida v. Tescher, 578 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1991); Wadsworth v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 564 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). It is also clear that the surviving spouse could waive her right of election to homestead, wholly or partly, before or after marriage, by a written waiver. § 732.702(1), Fla.Stat. (1987). But the plaintiff below executed no suc…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence