GEORGE FORREST, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GEORGE FORREST, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
564 So. 2d 648
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to the right of appellant to raise the competence of counsel issue by a proceeding under Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Blythe v. Blythe, 592 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…n-marital, with the exception of the husband’s Indiana State Trooper’s pension fund. It was error for the court not to have allocated to the husband that portion of the pension fund that accrued to him before the couple’s marriage. Gerbas v. Gerbos, 564 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). On remand, the court should determine that portion, and adjust the distribution of this asset accordingly. The final judgment also provided that the husband would be responsible for furnishing health insurance for the wife, of…
-
Downey v. Margherita Downey, 843 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…quitably distributed. Blythe v. Blythe, 592 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)(“It was error for the court not to have allocated to the husband that portion of the pension fund that accrued to him before the couple’s marriage”) (citing Gerbas v. Gerbas, 564 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)); Blase v. Blase, 704 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding that husband was entitled to his premarital share of his 401k plan.). We find unpersuasive the wife’s argument that the husband should be precluded from raising this…