LAURA DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, ETC., APPELLEES
LAURA DOUGLAS, APPELLANT,
THE FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, ETC., APPELLEES
564 So. 2d 1158
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. City of Clearwater v. Studebaker’s Dance Club, 516 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Malver v. Sheffield Industries, Inc., 502 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Glendale Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Department of Insurance, 485 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 494 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1986); § 45.061, Fla. Stat. (1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Zack v. State, 753 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2000)…imony in this case was proper lay opinion testimony. Fletcher testified as to her impression of Zack’s relationship with Midkiff after observing them interact over time. Testimony of this type does not require an expert witness. See Shiver v. State, 564 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Lastly, Fletcher testified that a treatment center in Oklahoma “wouldn’t have anything to do” with Zack because he “wouldn’t conform to any treatment program.” To the extent that this testimony was hearsay, it was admissible in…
-
Hudson v. State, 992 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 2008)…the telephone over to Peller and he called his father and left a recorded message saying: “Hi Dad. It’s your son. I love you. I just wanted to tell you and mom that I love you both much. I am about to die. I love you both. Bye.” In Shiver v. State, 564 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), the court found testimony that the witness said the appellant “looked like he was going to get revenge on somebody” was admissible as describing “the witness’s factual observation of appellant’s mental state at the time.” Id. at…
-
Wyatt v. State, 641 So. 2d 1336 (Fla. 1994)…r in this mention of the witness protection program is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See, e.g., Christmas v. State, 632 So. 2d 1368, 1371 (Fla.1994). Lastly, there was no error in McCoombs’ description of Wyatt’s demeanor. See Shiver v. State, 564 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). We reject without discussion Wyatt’s remaining guilt-phase claims because they have no merit.4 Wyatt’s remaining arguments pertain to the sentencing phase of the trial. He first asserts that the trial court erred in denying hi…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Glendale Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n: Cmty. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of the Palm Beaches: Naples Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. State, 485 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Berryer v. HERTZ, 502 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- City OF Clearwater v. Studebaker's Dance Club & Lawrence H. Liebling, 516 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)