CLARENCE ROBERT ISLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Clarence Isley pleaded nolo contendere to second degree murder and was sentenced to 30 years with a mandatory minimum, then appealed claiming his plea was involuntary, unintelligent, and coerced, and that he was incompetent. The court affirmed, holding that absent a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court, appellate review of plea validity is barred, and the defendant must proceed by way of a post-conviction 3.850 motion.
A defendant who fails to file a motion to withdraw a guilty plea in the trial court waives appellate review of the plea's voluntariness and intelligence. Such challenges must be raised in a motion to withdraw in the trial court, not on direct appeal, unless the appeal concerns subject matter jurisdiction, sentencing legality, government breach of the plea agreement, or voluntariness/intelligence of the plea with an express reservation. Post-conviction relief is available through a 3.850 motion, and counsel appointment for such motion is within the trial court's discretion.
[1] A defendant waives the right to appeal the voluntariness of a plea by failing to file a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court.
[2] Appeals from a plea are generally not a substitute for a motion to withdraw the plea, and issues concerning the plea's voluntary or intelligent character should first be…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“No motion to withdraw the plea was filed by the defendant in the trial court thereby waiving any appeal relating to the voluntariness of the plea.”
Establishes the procedural bar to appellate review of plea validity absent a trial court motion to withdraw.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDefendant Isley was indicted for first degree murder. He entered a negotiated nolo contendere plea to second degree murder, which the trial court acce…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appointment Of Appellate Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
DANIEL, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Clarence Isley, having been indicted for first degree murder, entered a negotiated nolo contendere plea to second degree murder. The trial court accepted the plea and sentenced the defendant to 30 years incarceration with a 3-year minimum mandatory term. Following notice of appeal, the appellate public defender filed an Anders brief. The defendant, concurrently, filed a pro se brief asserting that his plea was involuntarily and unintelligently tendered and that he was coerced by his trial counsel to change his plea from not guilty to avoid receiving a death sentence. Defendant further claims that he (the defendant) was incompetent at the time the plea was entered. We affirm the judgment and sentence of the court without prejudice to raise such matters before the trial court pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
No motion to withdraw the plea was filed by the defendant in the trial court thereby waiving any appeal relating to the voluntariness of the plea. See Byrd v. State, 419 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). In Byrd this court dismissed an Anders appeal where the appellant challenged the validity of his guilty plea without first filing in the trial court a motion to withdraw such plea. Without an express reservation of the right to appeal a particular issue, an appeal is permitted only where the defendant raises an issue concerning the trial court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the charge, the illegality of the sentence received, the failure of the government to abide by the plea agreement, or the voluntary and intelligent character of the plea. See Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979). In Robinson, however, the supreme court stated:
... [W]e find that an appeal from a guilty plea should never be a substitute for a motion, to withdraw a plea. If the record raises issues concerning the voluntary or intelligent character of the plea, that issue should first be presented to the trial court in accordance with the law and standards pertaining to a motion to withdraw a plea.
373 So. 2d at 902. Forasmuch as the record here shows no such motion to withdraw was filed in the trial court relief now, if any, is by way of an appropriate 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.
Defendant also seeks, by way of motion in this court, the appointment of counsel. That motion is denied. Should the defendant file a facially sufficient 3.850 motion the appointment of counsel for the defendant would be within the sound discretion of the trial court hearing such motion. See Gordon v. State, 529 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…y further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his 1988 conviction and sentence. See In re Grant Anderson, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2671, 129 L.Ed.2d 807 (1994). Enough is enough. AFFIRMED. PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. . Isley v. State, 565 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).…
-
Heatley v. State, 636 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…on is adverse to the defendant, it would be subject to review on direct appeal. Robinson, 373 So. 2d at 902. See also Trujillo-Pentate v. State, 609 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), reversed on other grounds 620 So. 2d 1231 (Fla.1993); Isley v. State, 565 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). In the present posture of this case, appellant’s reliance upon Ashley is misplaced. In that case, it was clear that the defendant entered his guilty plea prior to being informed that he would be treated as an habitual offender,…
-
Davis v. State, 571 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…led a timely appeal. The state, in the response ordered by this court, concedes that a claim that a plea was entered involuntarily is a valid basis for relief pursuant to Rule 3.850. See Mikenas v. State, 460 So. 2d 359 (Fla.1984); Isley v. State, 565 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Smothers v. State, 555 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Ward v. State, 545 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Joseph v. State, 540 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). When a trial court summarily denies a motion for post-conviction re…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Byrd v. State, 419 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- The Colonies Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Clairview Holdings, Inc., 419 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Gordon v. State, 529 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)