GLENN SCOTT RODRIGUEZ
v.
NICOLE STEPHANNIE FELICIA RODRIGUEZ
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court affirmed the dissolution judgment and remanded for correction of the income withholding order to specify the termination date for durational alimony and correct the child support reduction date.
The amended final judgment for dissolution of marriage is affirmed, but the income withholding order must be corrected to include the termination date for durational alimony and the correct date for child support reduction.
[1] An income withholding order for alimony must specify the termination date when the obligor's employer shall cease withholding and remitting funds once the durational alim…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant was ordered to pay $4,500 per month in durational alimony through July 1, 2032, and child support for the parties' children. The income with…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Family Law cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Appellant challenges the amended final judgment for dissolution of marriage and the post-final-judgment income withholding for child support and alimony order (“IWO”). Having carefully reviewed the record and the briefs filed, we affirm the amended final judgment without further discussion.
There are, however, two errors in the IWO that Appellee concedes should be corrected. First, Appellant was ordered in the amended final judgment to pay Appellee the sum of $4500 per month in durational alimony through July 1, 2032, but the IWO does not presently provide a date for Appellant’s employer to discontinue its withholding and remittance of money from Appellant’s pay check once Appellant’s durational alimony obligation ends. Second, the IWO contains an incorrect date for when Appellant’s child support payment is to be reduced once his obligation to pay support for the parties’ eldest child ends. The parties acknowledge that the present date of May 31, 2020, in the IWO is incorrect and should be corrected to reflect the date of May 31, 2019.
Accordingly, we affirm the amended final judgment for dissolution of marriage in all respects but remand for the entry of a corrected IWO consistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.
EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.