KEITH JOHANSEN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
KEITH JOHANSEN
STATE OF FLORIDA
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2023)
Positive Treatment
Per_curiam
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Keith Johansen’s judgment and sentence with one exception. The trial court erred in assessing investigative costs under section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2021), in the absence of a request from the State. See Richards v. State, 288 So. 3d 574, 577 (Fla. 2020) (“[T]he State must request investigative costs to make a defendant liable for those costs . . . .”). We remand for the trial court to enter an amended judgment without including these investigative costs. See Skinkle v. State, 338 So. 3d 1099, 1100 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022). In all other respects, we affirm. AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.
LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Smith v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)
- Johansen v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)