ROBERT JOHN DOYLE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT JOHN DOYLE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
565 So. 2d 797
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Skinner v. Skinner, 561 So. 2d 260 (Fla.1990); Smith v. State, 500 So. 2d 125 (Fla.1986); See Jones v. State, 446 So. 2d 1059 (Fla.1984); See Palmes v. State, 425 So. 2d 4 (Fla.1983); McCrae v. State, 437 So. 2d 1388 (Fla.1983); See Bailey v. State, 475 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); White v. State, 456 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668,104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Herrera v. State, 581 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…y not exercise its discretion to determine whether the state’s discovery violation has harmed or prejudiced the defendant without first conducting an inquiry into all the surrounding circumstances. State v. Hall, 509 So. 2d at 1096; Lester v. State, 565 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The majority finds no prejudice to the defendant; however, it is not within the province of the appellate court to “determine whether the error is harmless without giving the defendant the opportunity to show prejudice or harm.”…
Authorities Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)
- McCRAE v. State, 437 So. 2d 1388 (Fla. 1983)
- Smith v. State, 500 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1986)
- Jones v. State, 446 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 1984)
- Skinner v. Skinner, 561 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1990)
- Palmes v. State, 425 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1983)
- White v. State, 456 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Amado L. Pedroso v. State, 456 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Hamilton v. Quirk, 475 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Fernandez v. State, 475 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)