TAMIAMI RANGE & GUN SHOP, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

MARK WEISSMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND RICHARD KATZ AND MARK WEISSMAN, CO-PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Ruiz v. Leonard Steiner, M.D., 599 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …certiorari to quash that order. We recognize that an order denying discovery is ordinarily not reviewable by certiorari because the harm from such orders, as a general rule, can be rectified upon plenary appeal. See American Southern Co. v. Tinter, 565 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Vicorp Restaurants, Inc. v. Aridi, 510 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 519 So. 2d 988 (Fla.1987); National Beverage Suppliers, Inc. v. Esquire Products of Florida, Inc., 493 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). However, cer…
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Weeks, 696 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …trial court has broad discretion. Only when an order allowing discovery constitutes an abuse of discretion which would cause irreparable damage which cannot be remedied on appeal should the ruling be set aside. American Southern Co. v. Tinier, Inc., 565 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Lorei v. Smith, 464 So. 2d 1330 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 475 So. 2d 695 (Fla.1985). Clearly, in response to the motion to compel, Wal-Mart has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the materials which are the subj…
• Glenice Barfuss v. Diversicare Corp. OF Am., 656 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …n the case of an order regarding discovery, the trial court has broad discretion and only when such an order constitutes an abuse of discretion which would cause irreparable damage will the ruling be set aside. American Southern Co. v. Tinter, Inc., 565 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Even though Chapter 766 may be applicable to some of the actions complained of by Barfuss2, the trial court’s order is improper. As in Myron v. Doctors General, Ltd., 573 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), the [*488] court's action…