THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
OWEN TURNER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Owen Turner sued Atlantic Coast Line Railroad for injuries sustained when a railroad box car struck his wagon at a street crossing in Mulberry, Florida. The jury awarded $2,500 in damages, and on appeal, the railroad company challenged the verdict as excessive. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the judgment, finding it reasonable under the evidence.
The court held that the verdict was not excessive. Based on Turner's life expectancy of 16 years and pre-injury earning capacity of approximately $400 per year, the present value of his lost earnings alone would be $2,800, which exceeds the $2,500 award and does not account for pain and suffering or medical expenses.
“We think that the jury might very well have concluded from the evidence that Mr. Turner's capacity for earning money and working his farm was practically destroyed.”
Establishes the court's view that the jury had sufficient evidence to conclude Turner's earning capacity was destroyed, supporting the damage award.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOwen Turner, a 57-year-old farmer living on a small 12-acre farm near Mulberry, was struck by a railroad box car while riding in his wagon at a street…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Life Expectancy cases and more on FLexlaw
Hocker, J.
Owen Turner sued the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company in the circuit court of Polk county for damages for injuries sustained by the negligence of the railroad company in permitting a box car to run into a wagon on which Turner was riding at a street crossing in the town of Mulberry. Turner was thrown from the wagon and claims to have been injured. On the trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $2,500.00 with eight per cent, interest from the 21st of July, 1908. The defendant has brought this judgment here for review on writ of error. The only question insisted on here by the plaintiff in error is, that the judgment is excessive. There was evidence that Owen Turner, the defendant in error, was a farmer living on the Alafia river about five miles from Mulberry. He had a small farm of about twelve acres upon which he had lived’ about twenty years, and upon which he had raised a portion of his family of children. He cultivated the farm from year to year, and when he was not-thus employed he had been doing work on the public roads for which he received one dollar and fifty cen Is a day. At the time of the alleged injury Mr. Turner was fifty-seven years old. At that time he had a slight rupture or hernia, which had never before given him any special trouble or prevented him from following his usual avocations. When the wagon he was in was struck by the car it was pushed along the track for some distance and the wheels broken. Mr. Turner was thrown from the wagon and pushed or dragged for a few feet, but finally rolled off the track. He claims that his hernia was increased and aggravated by being thus thrown from his wagon and dragged along the track, and that ever since he has suffered more or less pain in his back, stomach, chest and hips; that he has been incapacitated from following his usual avocations, and is not able to do a day’s work; that he will never be in a condition to labor as before he was hurt. There is some confusion in the testimony of the physicians as to the extent of Mr. Turner’s injuries, and as to whether they are remediable, though they seem to think his only remedy is a surgical operation which might or might not relieve him, and which he might or might not survive. Mr. Turner’s life expectancy, according to the American Experience Mortality Tables in evidence, was about sixteen years. We think that the jury might very well have concluded from the evidence that Mr. Turner’s capacity for earning money and working his farm was practically destroyed. They may also have concluded from the evidence that his earning capacity as a laborer before he was hurt was as much as four hundred dollars a year, and this sum multiplied by sixteen years, his life expectancy, would amount to $6,400.00. The present value of this amount, even using as high as 8 % interest as the basis of calculation, will be $2800.00. This is $300.00 more than the jury allowed in their verdict, and leaves out of consideration any compensation for pain and suffering or medical expenses. There is no certain, uncontroverted evidence in this case which would authorize us to say the verdict and judgment are excessive.
The judgment below is affirmed. Taylor and Parkhill, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Si-iackleford and Cockrell, J. J., concur in the opinion.