SURAPO S. SORAKRAI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SURAPO S. SORAKRAI, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
566 So. 2d 71
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
It appears that this appeal has been taken directly from the denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). Accordingly, the appeal is subject to dismissal as premature. We note that the trial court, in accepting appellant’s plea of nolo contendere, agreed to certify that this case involves a question of great importance. However, we believe that substantially the same question already has been addressed by this court in a prior proceeding. State v. Sorakrai, 543 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
Appeal dismissed.
RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sellers v. State, 591 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…ial of his “motion to correct sentence to conform to verbal pronouncement.” Although the motion raises, at most, scrivener error, we believe it was properly [*332] brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See, e.g., Brown v. State, 566 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Sellers states that in 1982 he was charged with three separate offenses. He entered a plea to aggravated battery, in return for which the remaining charges were dropped. However, records from both circuit court and the Departme…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Surapo S. Sorakrai, 543 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)