MILISAV KUTLESIC, APPELLANT,
v.
GUARDIANSHIP OF KATIA KUTLESIC, APPELLEE
MILISAV KUTLESIC, APPELLANT,
GUARDIANSHIP OF KATIA KUTLESIC, APPELLEE
566 So. 2d 524
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant is given thirty days within which to furnish this court with an adequate record. If the appellant fails to supply an adequate record within thirty days, this appeal will be dismissed. If action of the trial court is needed within the thirty days to approve and settle a statement of the proceedings, jurisdiction is relinquished for that purpose. See Jones v. Jones, 359 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); In re Adoption of A.M.L., 297 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Morton L. Ginsberg & MLG Props., Inc. v. Lennar Fla. Holdings, 645 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…ched several documents to its amended complaint as exhibits. When a party attaches exhibits to the complaint those exhibits become part of the pleading and the court will review those exhibits accordingly. See and compare Franz Tractor v. J.I. Case, 566 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Health Application Systems v. Hartford Life Ins., 381 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); McClurkin v. Parrish Volvo, 317 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We are not bound by Lennar’s interpretation of the attached exhibits. The conclu…
-
Magnum Cap., LLC v. Carter & Assocs., LLC, 905 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…aint as admitted and to draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the pleading party. See id. However, if documents are attached to a complaint and conclusively negate a claim, the pleadings can be dismissed. See Franz Tractor Co. v. J.I. Case Co., 566 So. 2d 524, 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). If it is apparent that the claim cannot be cured by amendment, the dismissal may be with prejudice. See Kairalla v. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Found., 534 So. 2d 774, 775 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (“[A] dismissal with prej…
-
Warren v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 662 So. 2d 1387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…da Holdings, Inc., 645 So. 2d 490, 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), review denied, 659 So. 2d 272 (Fla.1995); Harry Pepper & Assocs., Inc. v. Lasseter, 247 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 252 So. 2d 797 (Fla.1971); Franz Tractor Co. v. J.I. Case Co., 566 So. 2d 524, 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). In this case, however, although the exhibits attached to the complaint do not clearly show that Dairyland was the primary insurance carrier, neither do the exhibits expressly negate this allegation or any other allegations o…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In re Adoption OF A. M. L., 297 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
- Jones v. Jones, 359 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)