HERRARD PHILLIPPE ANDRE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-07-17
No. 89-2607
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
566 So. 2d 527 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons and authority articulated in Rojas v. State, 552 So. 2d 914 (Fla.1989) and Miller v. State, 561 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), the defendant’s conviction for attempted manslaughter is reversed and remanded with directions to afford him a new trial.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Olson v. Potter, 650 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
    …ither the complaint or defense of the losing parties. The trial court should have awarded attorney’s fees to the appellees/cross-appellants since they prevailed on the motion for summary judgment on the doctrine of res judicata. Southford v. Hatton, 566 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). The trial court’s order denying attorney’s fees is reversed. This cause is remanded for determination of the amount of fees to be awarded pursuant to section 57.105. FRANK, C.J., and PARKER, J., concur. . Sarah Olson had reach…
  • Anderson v. Oldham, 622 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
    …d lawsuit filed by [*546] Mr. Oldham was frivolous both as to law and fact.1 As a result, based on section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes, the trial court erred in not awarding attorney’s fees to Dr. Anderson at the trial level. . Southford v. Hatton, 566 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (if second suit is res judicata, prevailing party is entitled to attorney's fees under Florida Statute 57.105(1)). See also Kreager v. Glickman, 519 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Ford v. Miller, 506 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…
  • Grady C. Judd v. Haegele (Fla. 6th DCA 2025)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw