WILLIAMSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2024-04-02
No. 2023-0111
372 So. 3d 1275 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2024) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 391 So. 3d 497
Cited by 3 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WALLIS, LAMBERT, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ssoc., 183 So. 3d 468, 470 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); Polymer Extrusion Tech. Inc. v. Glasshape Mfg., Ltd., 374 So. 3d 34, 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023). In contrast, de novo review is applied to a deprivation of procedural due process. Garrison v. Williamson, 372 So. 3d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023); Pena v. Rodriguez, 273 So. 3d 237, 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019). Additionally, “[w]hether a judgment is void is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Spector v. Uber, 250 So. 3d 720, 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quoting Vercosa, 17…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw