ARMANDO TORRES, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-08-28
No. 89-2779
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
566 So. 2d 843 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A defendant who has previously obtained an expungement within the last ten years is ineligible for further expungement, even if the trial court believes extraordinary circumstances exist.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant, acquitted of aggravated battery, sought expungement of his criminal record. The trial court denied the motion, finding the defendant in…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals a final order denying the expungement of his criminal record wherein he was acquitted on charges of aggravated battery. The trial court denied the motion. We affirm.

It affirmatively appears from the petition that the defendant had secured a prior ex-pungement of a criminal record within the previous ten years. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 943.058(2)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (1989); he was ineligible to seek expunction.

We cannot accept the defendant’s argument that his job as a police officer constituted extraordinary equitable circumstances entitling him to this relief, pursuant to section 943.058(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1987). Section 943.058(3)(a) was amended in 1988. The amended statute eliminates the trial judge’s equitable power to order expungement where the defendant does not meet the statutory requirements for such relief. § 943.058(2). See State v. Greenberg, 564 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (expungement statute is remedial, providing remedies civil in nature and thus applies retroactively). Therefore, since the defendant failed to meet the statutory requirements entitling him to seek expungement, the trial court was correct in denying the petition.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lewis v. State, 633 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Torres v. State, 566 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw