LEROY PENNINGTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LEROY PENNINGTON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
566 So. 2d 950
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on the authority of Burch v. State, 558 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1990).
LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Heilman v. Heilman, 596 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 1992)…onsent of the parties; (2) rule 1.491 was not properly invoked as to apply to non-title IV-D cases; and (3) there is no difference between rules 1.490 and 1.491. Slattery v. Slattery, 528 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), and Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 566 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), relied on by the petitioner, are inapplicable because they involved proceedings under rule 1.490, not rule 1.491. Oliveri v. Oliveri, 541 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), did involve proceedings under rule 1.491 but is distinguis…
Authorities Cited
- Burch v. State, 558 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1990)