GEORGE STUDNICKA, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES T. CARLISLE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. 4th DCA | 1990-09-05
No. 90-0820
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
567 So. 2d 17 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioners who are represented by counsel should file pleadings only through counsel. A defendant who has court-appointed counsel may not act as co-counsel as a matter of right. Goode v. State, 365 So. 2d 381 (Fla.1978). Nonetheless, we have considered the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits, and deny the petition on each point raised. As to the issue of proper venue, our denial is without prejudice to address this issue in the trial court.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003)
    …Stinnett v. State, 576 So. 2d 927, 929 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) ("Faretta does not entitle a defendant to 'hybrid' representation; there is no constitutional right of a defendant 'to choreograph special appearances by counsel.' "); Studnicka v. Carlisle, 567 So. 2d 17, 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) ("Petitioners who are represented by counsel should file pleadings only through counsel. A defendant who has court-appointed counsel may not act as co-counsel as a matter of right.”). .See Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974…
  • Land O'Sun Realty Ltd. v. Rewjb GAS Invs., 685 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …oses paragraphs 3 and 4 were respectively meant to serve was, despite the appellants’ protests, entirely correct. Royal Dev. & Management Corp. v. Guardian 50/50 Fund V, Ltd., 583 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Coscan Fla., Inc. v. Equiventure Fla., 567 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), review denied, 577 So. 2d 1325 (Fla.1991); Tropicana Club, Inc. v. James H. Topping, Inc., 502 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); First State Ins. Co. v. General Elec. Credit Auto Lease, Inc., 518 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Royal…
  • Smith v. State, 758 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
    …ate. Further, it appears Smith was represented by counsel when he filed his pro se demand, so the demand must be deemed a nullity. See Salser v. State, 582 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), rev. denied, 613 So. 2d 471 (Fla.1993); Studnicka v. Carlisle, 567 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), rev. denied, 576 So. 2d 292 (Fla.1991). In conclusion, we note that Smith alleges his trial date was April 3, 2000. This petition was not perfected until April 7, 2000. Thus, the petition for prohibition may well be moot. Howe…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw